Monthly Archive for May, 2008

Unequal gender representation in "objective" media

This video made me wonder: when men are referred to in the pejorative in media? It seems that that while society is rife with acceptable slurs for women, men are rarely frowned upon because of their nature or inappropriate behavior.  In “sex scandal” after “sex scandal” the politician stands in front of the media with his wife in tow, apologizing for his lapse in judgment before emphasizing how much he loves his family; meanwhile the woman he paid is vilified for her prostitution in the media and then by the courts.

In the indie film Amy’s Orgasm (the title is far more salacious than the film), lead Amy sits down with shock jock Matt to discuss her best selling book.  Despite their flirtatious banter, she reminds him, “slut, tramp, whore.  Those are all words that would describe you if you were a woman.  But you’re not. You’re a man; you’re a stud.  I don’t date studs.”   All of the nouns to describe a promiscuous woman have negative connotations, but for men, being a player is practically cause for celebration in their social circles.

Sexism has also had a role in the 2008 Presidential campaign.  Blog Shakesville has documented 103 instances of sexism in the coverage of Hilary Clinton thus far.  A CNN political commentator found himself in hotwater when he said some women deserve to be called a bitch, which by his definition seems to include aggressive, forceful women. . . in men that would be demonstrating traditional leadership skills and their ambitious.

As of 2006, women made up 50.7% of the US population, so if we’re offended by what we’re seeing, wouldn’t we “vote” to oust such negative stereotypes by choosing to consume different media?  One of the main reasons we don’t see more uproar over the unbalanced coverage of women is ignorance.  We’d have to recognize that the behavior is inappropriate,  rather than the norm, in the first place.

Let me digress to a personal anecdote.  In high school I reported being harassed by a group of male students in the hallways and in my chemistry class.  Guidance had to have a few words with the guys, and the inappropriate behavior quelled, which was my goal.  To my complete shock, a fellow classmate approached me in the hall to inform me that I was wrong to report the issue.  “We’re women; we have to put up with it.”

Sorry, I have to disagree; what we do not denounce, we encourage and the latest studies on sexual harassment show another generation of girls growing up believing derrogatory remarks related to their gender to be the norm. Teen self-esteem expert Courtney Macavinta recently blogged about a new UC Santa Cruz study that found 9 in 10 girls between the ages of 12-18 report at least once experience of harassment at school including

**receiving inappropriate and unwanted romantic attention, hearing demeaning gender-related comments
**being teased about appearance
**receiving unwanted physical contact
**being teased, bullied, or threatened with harm by a male

The study points out that

Moreover, girls who had learned about feminism through the media or from people in their lives, including mothers and teachers, were more likely to recognize it than girls who had never heard about feminism, and girls who felt pressure from parents to conform to gender stereotypes perceived more sexism than other girls

You have to be able to identify a problem to call it out and demand change.  Much like we’ve been desensitized to violence through TV, film, and video games; the same can be said of sexism and misogyny. Children are still in a culture that supports misogyny; at some point we have to break the cycle and stand up for equality, not just in women’s represenation in media, but for women in society in general.

Media that objectifies women and uses derogatory gender specific terminology reinforces language and ideology that denies women equal status. Judgement-neutral terminology should be the only acceptable language choice in so-called objective journalism, which is clearly, based on the above video, not the standard.

And it wouldn’t hurt if entertainment celebrated and multiplied strong female protagonists, instead of wondering why we need them.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Gen Y is taking the lead, one niche at a time

A few weeks ago Ryan Paugh at Brazen Careerist asked if Gen Y really wants to change the world because we seem to have an aversion to long term commitments and more public forms of activism that previous generations embraced.   I would counter that there are plenty of Millennials doing their part, but main stream media is so addicted to bad news, it gives sparse time to those individuals.  Additionally, since we’re such an individual-focused generation, we’ll have a harder time finding a single person who can represent us all.  We’re more likely to find heroes in our our niches.

Here are some recent news items about Millennials that had a very short tail in the media world.

Sure, the above Gen Yers are likely to be relatively ambitious to be doing the unthinkable and seemingly impossible.  
But imagine what our generation could do collectively if called to action. In 1961, JFK called on the American brain trust to get man to the moon within a decade and we did.  
Imagine if the next President called on us to develop clean energy, whether ocean water-powered cars or solar-powered heating and air conditioning units.  What could Gen X experience, combined with Gen Y optimism accomplish?

 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 

Want young adults to serve humanity? All you have to do is ASK.

“And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.”   JFK, Inaugural Address, 1961

Gallup recently surveyed 2000 Americans, on behalf of the Council for Excellence in Government, to gauge the interest level and commitment to a life in public service.

Despite generational differences in priorities, information sources, and modes of communication, a majority of Americans now say that a job in public service would be appealing. Yet, 60% of those under age thirty say they have never been asked to consider a job in government. However, if asked by their parents (33%) or the newly elected President in 2008 (29%), a significant share of Millennials say they would give such a request a great deal of consideration. In fact, the newly elected President in 2008 tops the list of motivators for those over thirty, with 30% saying they would give a great deal of consideration to this “ask.”

. . .

In addition, Millennials would also give a great deal of consideration to a job in government if asked by teachers or professors (27%) and other young people already working in government (22%).

The earliest Millenials are children of the 1980s, a decade of extreme excess and greed.  After being brought up in a society that puts corporate profit ahead of a nation’s citizens, it’s no wonder Millennials respond well to being given permission to put fiscal profit on the back burner.

I bring up this study published last month because Sen. Obama filled in for Sen. Ted Kennedy at Wesleyan University’s commencement today. His speech focused on how graduates could serve their nation, and is worth a read in full.  I’ve posted an abridged version below or you can watch the twenty minute video on YouTube.

. . . the history of this nation tells us . . . that we are a people whose destiny has never been written for us, but by us –

by generations of men and women, young and old, who have always believed that their story and the American story are not separate, but shared. And for more than two centuries, they have served this country in ways that have forever enriched both. . .

Each of you will have the chance to make your own discovery in the years to come. And I say “chance” because you won’t have to take it. There’s no community service requirement in the real world; no one forcing you to care. You can take your diploma, walk off this stage, and chase only after the big house and the nice suits and all the other things that our money culture says you should by. You can choose to narrow your concerns and live your life in a way that tries to keep your story separate from America’s.

But I hope you don’t. Not because you have an obligation to those who are less fortunate, though you do have that obligation. Not because you have a debt to all those who helped you get here, though you do have that debt.

It’s because you have an obligation to yourself. Because our individual salvation depends on collective salvation. Because thinking only about yourself, fulfilling your immediate wants and needs, betrays a poverty of ambition. Because it’s only when you hitch your wagon to something larger than yourself that you realize your true potential and discover the role you’ll play in writing the next great chapter in America’s story. . .

At a time of war, we need you to work for peace. At a time of inequality, we need you to work for opportunity. At a time of so much cynicism and so much doubt, we need you to make us believe again. . .

And so, should you take the path of service, should you choose to take up one of these causes as your own, know that you’

ll experience frustrations and failures. Even your successes will be marked by imperfections and unintended consequences. I guarantee you, there will certainly be times when friends or family urge you to pursue more sensible endeavors with more tangible rewards. And there will be times when you are tempted to take their advice.

But I hope you’ll remember, during those times of doubt and frustration, that there is nothing naïve about your impulse to change this world. Because all it takes is one act of service – one blow against injustice –to send forth that tiny ripple of hope that Robert Kennedy spoke of.

You know, Ted Kennedy often tells a story about the fifth anniversary celebration of the Peace Corps. He was there, and he asked one of the young Americans why he had chosen to volunteer. And the man replied, “Because it was the first time someone asked me to do something for my country.”
I don’t know how many of you have been asked that question, but after today, you have no excuses.

Sometimes all you have to do is ask.   North Carolina Governor Easley learned that lesson last fall when he asked state residents to cut back on water consumption because of severe drought conditions.  While the path of least resistance is often taken, some haven’t considered that the outcomes of the harder path might contribute to a greater good, that can’t be measured at the outset, as well as start a ripple that becomes a tidal wave of change.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

QOD: The Power of One

“Changes can come from the power of many, but only when the many come together to form that which is invincible. . . the power of one.”

You Bring the Milk, Illinois has the cookies!

Best Headline ever: 14 tons of spilled Oreo cookies snarl Ill. traffic

Police say a trailer loaded with 14 tons of double-stuffed Oreos has overturned, spilling the cookies still in their plastic sleeves into the median and roadway.

The crash about 50 miles southwest of Chicago remains under investigation.

Mahoney says no charges have been filed but both lanes of traffic remain closed while authorities remove the cookies.

Multimedia representation of online dating

Jonathan Harris and Sep Kamvar, present their “I Want You To Want Me” project on online dating.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Duh! Direct correlation between fast food availability and health issues

twin donutsphoto © 2006 David Salafia | more info (via: Wylio)One of my first impressions of Los Angeles was my shock that there was donut shop on every block. In the Valley there’s a strip mall with a retailer featuring donuts and fried chicken. . . I’ve often wondered what donuts from that shop taste like. . . I would hope they use a different vat for the chicken. . . This herd of donut stores surprised me because I thought California to be land of the granola-eating tree hugger; rather that stereotype is relegated to Northern California, while starvation diets and cosmetic surgery are all the rage in SoCal, to balance out the donut shops and cupcake bakeries.

A new UCLA study links poor health outcomes with one’s proximity to fast and junk food retailers. The LATimes reports

Higher rates of diabetes and obesity occur in neighborhoods — regardless of the residents’ income, race or ethnicity — where fast-food restaurants and convenience stores greatly outnumber grocery stores and produce vendors, according to a statewide study released today.

It makes sense. . . when you’re hungry and have money to burn, you’re not going out of your way for a meal. You stick within walking distance at lunch or stay relatively local for dinner with friends. Thus, your options are limited by the restaurants and stores in your local vicinity. While you ultimately decide where you go, your options are limited by your geography.

Of the top 10 franchises of 2008 (per Entrepreneur.com’s 29th Annual Franchise ranking), should you be looking to invest:

#1 7-Eleven (30,642 franchises)

#2 Subway (29,929 franchises

#3 Dunkin’ Donuts (7376 franchises)

#4 Pizza Hut (9881 franchises)

#5 McDonalds (20,099 franchises)

#6 Sonic Drive In (2656 franchises)

#7 KFC (11,071 franchises)

#9 Domino’s (2073 franchises)

Eight of the top 10 recommended franchises are fast food restaurants. Think about YOUR neighborhood, can you go a block through a city and not find deep friend or foil-bagged options? It’s an incredible rarity.

In California, the researchers found that

Obesity rates were 20% higher in neighborhoods with five or more times as many fast-food outlets as produce vendors, compared with those with three or fewer, the study found.

While it is an individual’s responsibility to to decide what’s for breakfast, lunch, and dinner; it’s a community’s responsibility to maximize the availability of healthy options when approving new business licenses and developing new strip malls and local attractions.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button