Monthly Archive for January, 2011

drought or deluge: climate change show stoppers

Here’s a recent visual aid from the U.S. National Drought Migration Center. Look at all that drought cropping up in key agricultural terrain over the last three months.

US Drought Monitor Migration Center - 3 month map

All around the world, communities are either drying out or faced with unprecedented deluges.

Eastern Europe is also experiencing dramatic weather pattern shifts that are drying out long-settled and long-farmed areas. For instance, by 2050, there may not be enough water in the Czech Republic to provide for household and farming needs, and a number of the country’s rivers are expected to run dry. Homeowners are digging four times deeper to hit groundwater in the country than just 30 years ago.

In must-read article Europe Begins to Run Short of Water, professor Michael Marek commented on the Czech Republic drought to Inter Press Service:

The Czech Republic is already seeing the effects of climate change in more frequent extreme weather events and changes in biodiversity.

“But possibly the most important change is in the increasing drying out of the landscape as drier periods get longer and are followed by bursts of intense rainfall which the dry soil cannot absorb. This has a very significant effect on underground water supplies.

Though the total amount of precipitation in the country has remained relatively consistent, rain falls less often, but in heavier storms that cause flooding but the dry ground can only take so much.

Queensland floodsphoto © 2011 Rob and Stephanie Levy | more info (via: Wylio) On the flipside, Australia was recently hit with storms and flooding that are being compared to the damage done by Hurricane Katrina, with damage estimates at $20 billion and rising across that state of Queensland, home to Brisbane, the third largest city in Australia. Countless residents have been displaced by flooding that has powered through more than 15,000 homes. Climate change — specifically one of the warmest years on record — is consider a factor in enhancing the impact of La Nina weather patterns that drove the natural disaster.

(Check out the Boston Globe’s extensive photo spread of the aftermath of the Queensland flooding.)

Scientists must kick themselves nightly for labeling climate change “global warming,” as that label has left deniers an easy avenue to mock scientists after extreme colds snaps and nickname-worthy blizzards that dump more than a foot of snow at a time. . Despite the overwhelming support of the scientific community and their conclusions that human behavior — particularly Western industrial behavior – is a root cause of climate change, American deniers hold public policy hostage, refusing to address the issue.

How much longer can we ignore a global threat when the benefits of addressing the issue include  a green jobs economy, less reliance on Middle Eastern oil, a cleaner environment and less money getting into the hands of terrorists? Especially since the flip side is increasingly violent and extreme weather, shifts in climate that dramatically affect the ability to produce food in nations around the world, and dwindling fresh water supplies that could yield global military action.

Seems like the impact and cost of climate change increases exponentially while American politicians sit it out.

VOD: Dance Dance

Hope you take some time to inject a bit of silly into your weekend with the help of Sean Stephenson

H/T Margie’s Blog

GOP representing a minority of their constituents

Here’s a chart that illlustrating the number of unemployed constituents versus wealthy households in districts represented by a Republican Senator.

Unemployed V. Rich Households By State with Republican Senator

Wonk Room uses this char to point out that GOP senators represent 4 times as many unemployed people as wealthy households, yet the GOP practically started a war of words against the unemployed when the Democrats were busy capitulating on the Bush tax cuts.

The attacks on the those collecting unemployment would have you believe that the unemployed are relaxing at home collecting 50% less in earnings and doing nothing to return to full time employment status.  They’re just lazy folks who won’t go out and get a job.   Unproductive stigma and stereotyping is not getting a country to work.

While I’d like to hope that come November 2012, residents of those states will remember the rhetoric used to dismiss the concerns of the unemployed, it’s probably not going to happen.  There wasn’t much of an uproar from constituents when the verbal attacks on the employment-challenged were actively taking place.

And I have to wonder in part if it’s a matter of self-identification.  With more than 15 million people unemployed (a very conservative estimate), is an element of “I can’t believe it happened to me” in play? Joe/Jane Average has been dutifully reporting to work for X years and gets laid off after a round of budget cuts that couldn’t be avoided.

When listening to your representative going off on a tangent about the employed, you’re not considering yourself a part of THAT group; afterall, you were a hardworking, tax paying citizen that fell victim to the economy.

Monogamy and seeing other people

176/365 - Always Kiss Me Goodnightphoto © 2010 Courtney Carmody | more info (via: Wylio)In a soon to be published study of young adults (18-25 years old), researchers found that huge misunderstandings about monogamy occur in 40 percent of couples, leading to plenty of partners who think they’ve chosen fidelity, while the other partner is unaware of such an agreement.

Disturbingly, mutually-understood monogamy is less likely in couples with children than those without. Since the type of birth control used tends to shift over the course of a relationship, many women are at increased risk of contracting a sexually transmitted infection if condom use is discontinued.

Silly of me to assume that if you’re planning to be tied to a child with someone for a lifetime, you’ve ended outside entanglements for the duration of your romantic relationship with your co-parent.

Update: A Daily Dish reader debunked the study, pointing out that the subjects were all selected because they self-identified as being part of a high risk or potentially non-monogamous relationship.

Coffee Party Summit on Corporate Money in Politics this weekend

This weekend, the Coffee Party is hosting a DC Summit focused on Corporate Money in Politics as a follow up to the Supreme Court’s Citizen’s United Decision.

If you’re not in the DC area, there may be a local event taking place near you.

Relying on love of country to buoy life satisfaction

Old Glory, Patriotic Rustic Peeling American Flag, The Stars & Stripes, Red, White, Blue, on Woodphoto © 2009 Beverly | more info (via: WylioIn a recently published study in Psychological Science, University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign researchers Morrison, Tay and Diener examined data from over 132,000 respondents in 128 countries to consider the relationship between personal life (subjective well-being, aka SWB) and country satisfaction.

We found that the relationship between national satisfaction and
life satisfaction was stronger in the poorest countries of the world, for those with less income, and those with fewer household conveniences. The moderating role of GDP, income, and conveniences reveals that when individuals have greater trouble meeting their basic needs, external factors such as group evaluations come to have a stronger influence on SWB. . .

Those in poverty may elevate nationhood to a more central component of their social identity, thus making it more relevant in judging their quality of life. This might explain why ratings of  national satisfaction are higher on average than ratings of life satisfaction among relatively poorer individuals and those living in the poorer countries.

When faced with financial and material struggles in your own life, you’re more apt to look for that glimmer of hope in less immediate aspects of life. The current economic slump has a far reaching impact as working Americans face employment uncertainty, the mortgage crisis and financial challenges.

The personal experience of the recession makes a wavering American dream unacceptable. Accordingly, politicians pitch their policies as a way to prolong America’s greatness in the world and challenge fellow candidates who would deign to impugn the reputation of our country during campaign season. We’re going to have success and happiness with our lives any way we can, even if we’re trying to live vicariously through the very idea of greatness.

As important as it is take comfort and pride in your national identity, relying on it to buoy spirits means ignoring growing threats to the long term to health and vitality of the US.

The longer the recession, the longer it may take to face some hard truths for our country.

Take the health care reform debate, if it could even be called a debate. Serious shortcomings in our health delivery and insurance mechanisms were overlooked, if not completely ignored. America’s best cheerleaders plugged the ignorant, but carefully formulated, messaging that the US has the best health care system in the world.

Factually, it does not. Despite spending more on health care per person than anywhere else in the world, we rank 49th in life expectancy. As  much as health care reform oppositions liked to cite surveys of dissatisfaction with the waits for treatment in Canada or the UK, they rank 10th and 28th, respectively. We rank a lowly 33rd in infant mortality, against bested by the UK (22) and Canada (23). But those facts didn’t matter.

Or we could look at our students’ performance up against those of other OECD nations: in 2009 we ranked 14th in reading, 17th in science, 25th in math. Are those the scores of the next generation of leaders of industry and innovators in technology?

We could go on and on from failing infrastructure to our disproportionate incarceration rates, etc.

Even sadder, these challenges could give us a rallying point around which we could further strengthen our love of country and its performance for its people.

1 in 5 are heroes

Super Hero Prisonphoto © 2010 Cameron Russell | more info (via: Wylio)Stanford’s Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education sponsored a study that found the rate of everyday heroism.   Nearly 4000 adults were asked “Have you ever done something that other people — not necessarily you yourself — considered a heroic act or deed?”

Researcher Philip Zimbardo, of Stanford prison experiment notoriety, found that 20% of respondents met the definition of a hero: “they had helped during a dangerous emergency, taken a stand against injustice, or sacrificed for a stranger.”

Interestingly, Hispanics and African-Americans are twice as likely to report heroic behavior — though follow up research is necessary to establish the reason/s why.

Unsurprisingly, heroes noted regular volunteerism or felt the impact of tragedy or disaster first hand; empathy clearly plays a role.  When someone in your community is at risk, and you have the power to make a positive impact, it’s hard to simply walk away.

Lynn Stout’s research focuses on putting such prosocial behavior front-and-center in policy debates.  When factoring in studies like the Stanford prison experiment and Stanley Milgram’s shock research,  a Jekyl/Hyde syndrome emerges with several factors determining whether people are apt to work for self gain or the greater good.  Of them, people are willing to act at a (potential) cost to themselves when the benefits to the community outweigh the cost.

The opportunity to step up isn’t so unusual.  And old fashioned peer pressure, just by living by example, can make prosocial reactions and actions the norm.

QOD: Greatness

EddieCola_2photo © 2010 Eddie | more info (via: Wylio)

Considerations for bloggers

For those of you (and me) still mastering the science of blogging, here’s a quasi-technical break down of what to do, or not, as well as the link sharing and posting behaviors on Twitter and Facebook.

Takeaways:

  • Post new content in the AM, not late at night (yes, I know the presenter is talking to me.)
  • If I want eyeballs, post during the business week; if I want reader engagement, post on the weekend.  Conclusion: don’t be a slacker.
  • Shamelessly self-promote via social media channels over long weekends; pre-schedule promotional tweets via tools like Hootsuite.
  • Blog early and often? If only I could have a team of blogging minions to help me out…a girl can dream.

Is anyone else disappointed that semi-colons don’t get more love on Twitter?

Which of your blogging behaviors will you change?

Are Principles of Responsible Media Consumption Enough?

Whatever you thinkphoto © 2009 Capture Queen | more info (via: Wylio)On Wednesday afternoon, the New America Foundation hosted Director of the Knight Center for Digital Media Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University and author of Mediactive Dan Gillmor for a conversation and Q&A about the impact of rapidly-evolving social technology on news production and consumption.

As part of the moderated discussion, Gillmor shared his 5 Principles of Media Consumption:

1. Be skeptical.

Don’t take anything you read at face value.  The information source can clue you into the bias that may be present.  Gillmor dismisses the notion of objectivity; everyone and every media outlet has a worldview of some sort.

2. Don’t be equally skeptical of everything.

Use your best judgment when evaluating media and finding sources to trust.  Sweeping generalizations and extremes may raise flags when you’re watching and reading. Over time you’ll find reliable news sources that you can go back to again and again.

3. Question yourself and your worldview.

When you care deeply about an issue it’s hard to remove yourself from that subjective space to consider new information that may conflict with your beliefs.   Be willing to challenge your own biases and cast a wider net on the type of media you consume.  It’s easy to find news sources that parrot your own beliefs,

4.  Seek out opinions and perspectives different from your own.

(3 and 4 could be merged, but then we’d only have 4 principles, which doesn’t feel right.)  Do your homework and learn about things you’re not likely to counter in your own life.  You’ll be more informed and perhaps a bit more aware of the privileges and disadvantages of the groups you identify with.

5. Understand how media can be used to persuade and manipulate.

Factor in a 24-hour news cycle and profit margins into your consideration of media.  What does the media company want you to believe and how does it benefit if you do?  Don’t just look at what angles are pursued, but consider why?

Overall, these are excellent basic tips for expanding your worldview, as well as evaluating the weight and accuracy of the media you consume, but how do you convince people that they want or need to move beyond the echo chamber and filter bubble effect?  How do you convince people to be skeptical of the news sources that tell them what they want to hear?

We all thoroughly believe our worldview is the correct worldview.

Remember the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor last summer, when Republicans expressed so much concern over her wise Latina remarks?  Because the perspective of a privileged white male is so sacrosanct that there must be something wrong with that notion that a group of judges another race, culture or gender might draw different conclusions.  To many of the male elected-officials in that hearing, there is only one way to look at the world.

The average media consumer is no different.

For more, you can download Mediactive for free or buy a copy.