Tag Archive for 'consumerism'

On the American obsession with stuff

Shop until you dropphoto © 2004 Rob Holland | more info (via: Wylio)In Switch!, the Heath brothers open with a study examining the impact of concession stand product sizes with the volume of snack consumption at movie theaters by individual research subjects. The larger the popcorn containers the more people ate.

That subconscious response is why nutritionists often recommend dieters serve their meals on smaller plates.  Even if you clear a salad-sized plate of food, you’re still coming in under the calorie count of a full dinner place – a mind game that helps keep you on track with weight loss goals.

And that same psychology appears to apply with overall consumption too.  This weekend the WSJ reported on Commerce Department data indicating that 11.2 percent of American spending in 2011 is for non-essential purchases (exclusive of requisite items like food, housing and medicine).  Despite a recession and mass unemployment, people are still shopping for wants beyond their needs; in 1959 such goods only accounted for four percent of spending.

This growth in non essential spending seems to parallel with the ever expanding square footage requirements of American home owners.  The average home in 1950 was just 983 square feet compared with 2349 square feet for new homes in 2004.

Purchasing a home typically means moving into a large space. Thus, owners grow into a  new space buying items to furnish extra rooms and to cover empty walls and to fill the nooks and crannies that give a home character. The advertising industry — having created the Pavlovian need to keep up with the Joneses — and a consumer technology sector — with routine product enhancements every 18 months or so a la Moore’s Law, combined with environmentally tone-deaf planned obsolescence — ensure a steady drum beat of purchasing whenever dollars can be spared.

Buying habits encourage an eventual move into a larger home when the perfectly sunny abode at the end of a quiet cul-de-sac no longer seems quite as spacious. With packing comes the tossing of dated furniture and appliances that can be upgraded to shiny, new replacements. Disposing of forgotten tchotchkes or ill-fitting clothing creates even more opportunity to spend.

And it creates a kind of geographic inertia that tugs on an economy in crisis.  Ever so slowly, the cost of relocating for more lucrative — or any — opportunities creeps toward burdensome and cost prohibitive. People get tied to more than the roots in their community; they get bogged down by an obesity of stuff.

Collaborative Consumption: Can Social Technology Grow Community and Lessen Humanity’s Carbon Footprint?

The globalization of  the world economy and the increased ease of relating to people via social technology, both domestically and internationally, has made interpersonal ties with digital contacts as seamless as real world relationships for Gen Y, changing our notion of community.   Rachel Botsman, co-author of the newly published What’s Mine is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumerism, discussed some of the findings  of her research in a TED talk earlier this year.

Botsman found four core drivers in the shift to collaborative consumption:

  1. A renewed belief in the importance of community
  2. A torrent of peer to peer social networks and real time technologies
  3. Pressing unresolved environmental concerns
  4. A global recession that has fundamentally shocked human behaviors

These drivers are very interconnected.

The recession shifted many employed working and middle people from a life lived on credit to one of paying down debt and squirreling away discretionary income for a rainy day.  The long-term unemployed find inventive ways to stretch a dollar before turning to family and friends, when available, for assistance when their savings, and then government support, dries up.

In both cases community is elevated.  Interpersonal experience increasingly supplants excessive consumerism as  a way to spend one’s leisure time.  The status of stuff becomes less relevant in a world tat increasingly relies on friendship and family, however one defines the terms. Who you know takes on a greater import that what you own. Peer-to-peer networks allow you to expand the reach of your social web, which can mean increased opportunity, personally and professionally.

All of these relationships require an investment in building social capital, requiring some degree of trust as a foundation.  That growing trust allows for redistribution markets like SwapTree and BookMooch and product service systems like Rent the Runway, Zipcar or Bag, Borrow or Steal to gain  a foothold in a global economy otherwise focused on planned obsolescence.

A positive side effect of these changes, Gen Y is unconsciously taking a step towards addressing environmental issues by shifting to systems that allow for the rotation of ownership and use of goods and services  This shift means fewer critical natural resources plundered as the utility of extant goods is expanded over time.

As collaborative consumption moves from trendy to normative behavior, the user community will continue to expand as more people participate.  It could mean increased cross-cultural engagement and a lessening of the carbon footprint of humanity, which may open the doors to more directed action on environmental and social issues.

The power of freebies and community service

photo by benimoto

I spent Tuesday night and Wednesday at the California Governor’s Conference for Women.   It’s my second year volunteering with a non-profit at their booth in the exhibitor’s hall.

Thus, my conference experience is a bit different than those that bought tickets or were given ones by their employers.

There are two primary types of exhibitors — corporations and nonprofits.  Non-profits rent booths to raise the profile of their organizations and philanthropic work, as well as to add as many names as possible to their e-mail lists. With non-profits, you’re more apt to get a brochure than a bag of chips or a notebook, so traffic at these booths tends to be sporatic at best. Corporations typically come laden with all sorts of schwag to hand off to the greedy consumer masses, whose hearts swell at the thought of collecting “free stuff. In fact, attendees are given tote bags as they check in, semi-filled with product samples, to allow for the the collection of all sorts of promotional items and snack foods.

This year, the organization I went with brought a “wheel of philanthropy.”  It’s essentially a prize wheel.  The majority of the slots were filled with ice breaker questions  like, “How do you serve your community?,”  “How do you pamper yourself?” and “Who inspires you?”  The questions are meant to open up a dialogue, so that we can ultimately point out the benefits of membership.  But 2 of the landing spaces offered raffle tickets (for a 1-year membership and a $100 gift card to a Los Angeles area skin spa chain), and 2 others offered up a free lip gloss.

Clearly, the Programs Manager struck gold.  That wheel drew women in like flies to honey, since a good spin could land you a free lip gloss or an entry into a raffle.  We had a steady line of women throughout the day (nonprofits generally don’t get lines without a celebrity assist), waiting to spin that wheel.  Those landing on the raffle ticket spots didn’t even need to know what we were giving away, before they gladly signed up for our mailing list and a chance to win something, anything.  Our presence at the conference meant hundreds of new names on the mailing list.

After a day and half working the conference, I’ve drawn two polar opposite conclusions.

On the one hand, the women in attendance were incredibly dedicated to their communities.  I talked to social workers, grad students of social work, teachers and mentors through Big Brothers/Sisters.  One remained a member of the local parent teacher organization, though she has no kids left in the system.  Others served on charity boards, raised funds to provide a constructive environment for women recently released from prison and ran drives to collect suits for low income women looking for work.  Some volunteered at soup kitchens or animal shelters. They led Bible study sessions and soup kitchens, led scout troops and ran marathons for medical research. Most women remained actively involved in multiple community service projects and seemed unimpressed by their own remarkable contributions to society.

Community organizing in its many incarnations is natural to the women in attendance.  They’re at a leadership conference, so I should have expected to hear about this devotion beyond self.

Alternately, I’m rather dismayed by the behavior of a fairly large minority of women at the conference who looked at the exhibit hall as a freebie take-all. When a company brings product samples, it doesn’t mean take 5 since they’re sitting out in the open.  Self control and moderation should kick in at some point, as you realize you’re not the only person in the exhibition hall.

By the end of the conference, my booth’s volunteers were a bit flabberghasted.  Women salivating over the lip glosses, asking “are these free?”  The disappointment clearly stamped across their faces when they were told “no, you need to ‘spin and win.’”  Women who upon landing a question space, not a free lip gloss, turned and walked away, ignoring those staffing the table. The woman who tried to covertly grab an entire handful of lip products, not just one, surprised to find herself foiled by an eagle-eye volunteer who explained they aren’t samples.  The women who strategically stay and chat for a few minutes about the thought-provoking question they landed on, before picking up a lip gloss and saying, “come on, I can take one, right?,” suggesting with their eyes that yes, I played your game, now give me what I want.

And my personal favorite, the woman who approached at the end of the day Wednesday, refusing to make eye contact with any of the volunteers, who tries to help herself to the remaining lip glosses. She summed up the attitude of that minority of gluttonous women who tried to stock up like  Christmas came early.

Our exchange, emphasis mine:

Me: I’m sorry. Those aren’t freebies.

Lady: It’s the end of the event; you have to get rid of them.

Me: Actually, we don’t. We’re a non-profit.

Lady: Oh (with disdain)You’re going to take them back with you.

Me: Yes we are. We can use them at another event.

Lady: looks longingly one last time at the lip gloss (ironically, the shade Goddess) before turning abruptly and heading towards the exit. No “spin and win” for her.

Since I had the opportunity to sit in on one of the panel sessions, I am trying to convince myself that this ballsy minority merely found itself overwhelmed by the exhibition hall.  The moderated discussions taking place at the Conference Hall were intense and served to inspire us all to do more.  We just have to find a place to store all the pens, notebooks, highlighters, charm necklaces, snack food packages and cosmetic samples first.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

What Would Jesus Buy? Our obsession with stuff

A few months ago I posted a great award winning video, The Story of Stuff, which looks at consumer lifestyle in the US. Given the average American has more than $9000 in credit card debt, materialism is not a relic of Michael Douglas’s Wall Street.

But you have to wonder, where do people put all their stuff? I know a guy who collects Legos; he dreams of one day building a Lego master piece and is painstakingly collecting all sorts of special Lego pieces for this grand oeuvre. Where does he keep the thousands and thousands of legos he has amassed? In a store locker on the East Coast. . . seriously.

My friend is not alone. Alternet’s Martin John Brown writes:

According to the Self Storage Association, an industry advocacy group, square footage of rentable storage has increased 740 percent in the past two decades; a billion square feet of storage space was created between 1998 and 2005; and there are now 6.8 square feet of storage for every man, woman and child in America. Chris Sonne, a storage expert at Cushman & Wakefield Inc., estimates there are 45,000 storage facilities today compared to zero 50 years ago.

I’m flabbergasted that people buy more stuff than they have space for. If you aren’t going to use it regularly, is there really a purpose in buying it at all? When shopping for clothes I aways consider the price:use ratio. If it’s an item I’m likely to wear weekly, I can justify spending more for it. But to have boxes of household goods and clothing in storage for perpetuity? Why do you have that stuff in the first place?

Average tenancies nationwide are somewhere between one and two years, say Scanlon and Sonne, and some renters simply never leave.

“I have one renter who’s been here since we opened — in 1990,” says Dawn Spencer, a manager at Clackamas River Mini Storage outside of Portland. “He pays automatically, by credit card, never comes in. Lives in another state now.”

“It’s an industry that builds on inertia,” says Paul Adornato, an analyst for BMO Capital Markets. “People would much rather have $150 withdrawn automatically out of their checking account every month than have to wake up on a Saturday morning, rent a truck, move out the stuff, do something with the stuff … see what I mean?”

Our nation’s obsession with “stuff” is rarely discussed, despite its impact, which is why I so thoroughly enjoyed the documentary What Would Jesus Buy? The film documents Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping on their holiday crusade to get people to give more and buy less. (The group has officially been banned from Starbucks locations globally after taking their act to a Starbucks venue.) The films looks at the community impact of excessive shopping at discount retailers, as well as the financial and social effects of reckless consumerism. Their tale is easier to swallow cloaked in humor, but it does address the serious realities of our shopping culture.

Though we have 198 days until Christmas rolls around again, I highly recommend the film, perhaps partnered with a money party for your closest friends.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Watch "The Story of Stuff"

stuffbanner.jpg
Someone recently sent me the link to view The Story of Stuff, a” 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns.”
Some of those facts underscore the importance of America getting on board to save the planet via agreements like the Kyoto Protocol and recycling and legislation to limit further degradation of the environment.
  • 1/3 of the earth’s natural resources have been consumed in the last 30 years
  • 75% of the global fisheries are fished at or beyond capacity.
  • In the US, 40% of the waterways are now undrinkable
  • Less than 4% of US virgin timber remains
  • The United States is just 5% of the world’s population, but uses 30% of its resources and generates 30% of the waste.

Personally, I’m fascinated by the carefully constructed consumption driven society the US has become. Here are two snipits focusing on consumerism.

The sad truth is that 99% of what we buy is trashed in 6 months.  In our instant gratification society, we expect to be able to buy what we need at any given point in time, so the need to keep our possessions safe and in working condition just isn’t there.

What do you think of the video? Is it food for thought? Does it make you reconsider your own spending habits? Or is it just a scare tactic?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button