Tag Archive for 'Democrats'

Why I Don't Like Politicians

“We will lose on legislation. But we will win the message war every day, and every week, until November 2010,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., an outspoken conservative who has participated on the GOP message teams. “Our goal is to bring down approval numbers for [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and for House Democrats. That will take repetition. This is a marathon, not a sprint.”

The Republicans are engaged in a pseud0-scorched earth policy because they’re  sore losers, making it a lose-lose scenario for us.  When Republicans are in charge, their policies aren’t particularly helpful to MOST Americans, and when they’re not in charge, they’re trying to eliminate the possibility that Democratic policy could make up lost ground.

Hilary Clinton at least had the maturity to suck it up and take on a constructive, proactive role under the Obama Presidency.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Obama: So you want to be a rockstar?

Back in March, Obama’s speech on race, “A More Perfect Union,” quickly joined Martin Luther King, Jr’s “I Have a Dream” and JFK’s Inaugural address as historically significant.

His eloquence continues to captivate audiences and drove the Obamamania that helped him capture the nomination.

In February, Politico’s Lisa Lerer pointed out, “Many talented politicians attract devoted throngs — but with Obama, the fervency of his following borders on the messianic. . . .”  He has more than 1.25 million supporters on his FaceBook candidacy page versus fewer than 100,000 on the Stop Barack Obama page (there are more than 500 pro/anti Obama groups on the site). More than 14,000 supporters on LinkedIn wear an Obama badge on their profile, and his question, “What ideas do you have to keep America competitive in the years ahead?,” generated more than 3000 responses. (McCain sports under 1400 LinkedIn badges, a group not even linked to McCain’s own profile — a short coming that is sure to be rectified. . . not.)

Barack Obama has been elevated beyond the political realm; these days he’s a rockstar. And now you get to party with him too!

On Thursday, August 28th, Obama will formally acknowledge and accept his candidacy for President in front of 75,000 people at a Denver stadium.  While most who attend will score freely distributed tickets, the Obama campaign is holding back the special treatment for 10 donors + guests.   Per an e-mail from BarackObama.com (bolding mine):

It’s going to be an amazing event, and Barack would like you to join him. Free tickets will become available as the date approaches, but we’ve reserved a special place for a few of the people who brought us this far and who continue to drive this campaign.

If you make a donation of $5 or more between now and midnight on July 31st, you could be one of 10 supporters chosen to fly to Denver and spend two days and nights at the convention, meet Barack backstage, and watch his acceptance speech in person. Each of the ten supporters who are selected will be able to bring one guest to join them.

Obama has elevated politics to the height of fandom, and is now staging marketing gimmicks, typically reserved for celebrity-laden movie premieres and concert tours, to drive donations.  I await the announcement about how these “special” guests will be selected, as well as how effective a fundraiser this special offer is when July numbers are announced.

Can the master orator avoid jumping the shark two months before Election Day? Will he be able to rise to the occasion and deliver a speech that will keep his supporters on board and sway the undecided and Independents?  Or will Americans step back when they see how much larger than life Obama has become?

If all goes swimmingly, and his tide doesn’t turn, can we expect a similar fundraising push come October, offering a front seat at an Obama inauguration in January?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Quote of the Day: Margaret Cho

“Why are white men allowed to look at the issues and judge for themselves and the rest of us are expected to take sides grade school style? That is racist and sexist and dumb. That is like if all the stupid people voted for Huckabee (please God let this not happen).”

so sayeth Margaret Cho, blogging on the Huffington Post re: America’s Next Top President

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

What your subconscious says about the Presidential Candidates

I stumbled across a nifty analyzer of your implicit positive and negative associations regarding the Presidential candidates. In less than 10 minutes, you’ll know how favorable your subconscious opinion of each of the main Presidential candidates for either the Republican or Democratic party.

Per its website Project Implicit “is a Virtual Laboratory for the social and behavioral sciences designed to facilitate the research of implicit social cognition: cognitions, feelings, and evaluations that are not necessarily available to conscious awareness, conscious control, conscious intention, or self-reflection.”

I most favored John Edwards with Clinton and Obama trailing equally behind. Richardson came in last. Overall, Democrats have a relatively high standing in my subconcious. I wonder how the Republican candidates would fare against my brain?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

QOD: There's hope yet

Pew Research publishes a “daily number” each day on its site; given the wealth of data Pew generates annually, it has more than enough interesting statistics to provide an interesting one for every day of the year. Today’s daily number notes that

In the 2006 mid-term elections for Congress, young people, ages 18-24, voted overwhelmingly for Democrats over Republicans, by a 58%-37% margin, according to national exit polls… 48% of young people identified themselves as Democrats or leaned toward the Democratic Party, while only 35% identified themselves as Republicans – the lowest number recorded by Pew in its nearly 20-year trend. This makes them the least Republican generation.

This finding isn’t particularly surprising to me; Perhaps my left-wing tendencies bias me. Generation Y is consistently being credited with an expectation of greater corporate social responsibility. Money is not the end all be all for this generation, which wants work to be more than just a paycheck. Additionally, Generation Y has a greater sense of social responsibility than previous generations. USA Today’s Sharon Jayson reported in the fall of 2006 about some of the social issues that matter to Generation Y.

Two-thirds of college freshmen (66%) believe it’s essential or very important to help others in difficulty, suggests a survey of 263,710 students at 385 U.S. colleges and universities.

Watching the last 8 years of a Republican White House and the posturing of Republican leaders during the Clinton administration, the core beliefs of much of Gen Y don’t seem to fit with Republican ideals.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Toilet Paper gets political

323866_sanitary_paper_2.jpg

Saturday night I camped out at a friend’s place to watch Jon Bon Jovi hosting SNL. Let’s not get started on how awful the show was — seriously, were those the best skits the writers could come up with? Maybe it should be 1st Saturday of the Month Live, so they can do 1 good show a month.

Anywho, Charmin toilet paper was advertised during one of the commercial breaks. (For those of you who haven’t seen the ad, you can click here and go to videos (on the far right of the menu) to spend your free time watching toilet paper-loving bears frolic on the beach near port-a-potties. You know you want to!)

I found it interesting that their new lines of toilet paper were branded in red and blue. One red and one blue bear are running down the beach, the blue bear slightly in the lead before heading to the loo. The red bear props his “ultra strong” Charmin on his right bicep, while the blue bear snuggles his “ultra soft” Charmin stroking it.

The voice over artist announces, “now you can go strong or you can go soft…new Charmin ultra strong in the red and new Charmin ultra soft in the blue. Rediscover Charmin, choose the one that’s best for you.

I find it interesting that during election season, a company would choose new branding in red and blue. Is there some sort of subliminal messaging that Republicans are “strong” and Demcrats are “soft”? And in regards to what issue(s) is this comparison being made?

Am I reading too much into a toilet paper ad. . . .what do you think?