McCain couldn’t keep his eyes off of Palin’s ass during her intro speech in Ohio. Nor could he help but twist his wedding band while staring. . . VP is probably not the position he was thinking about.
Tag Archive for 'misogyny'
I’m dreaming of mass MSM coverage of McCain’s talking points at this event; I imagine they’re golden.
(Via Cliff Schlecter via Shakesville)
White House trying to define contraceptives as abortion. Hilary Clinton condemns the move ; sign her petition
Measuring the effectiveness of the anti-choice/pro-life agenda
McSexist: McCain’s War on Women
More than 60% of skin care products are absorbed by the skin. Do you know what’s in yours?
In the indie film Amy’s Orgasm (the title is far more salacious than the film), lead Amy sits down with shock jock Matt to discuss her best selling book. Despite their flirtatious banter, she reminds him, “slut, tramp, whore. Those are all words that would describe you if you were a woman. But you’re not. You’re a man; you’re a stud. I don’t date studs.” All of the nouns to describe a promiscuous woman have negative connotations, but for men, being a player is practically cause for celebration in their social circles.
Sexism has also had a role in the 2008 Presidential campaign. Blog Shakesville has documented 103 instances of sexism in the coverage of Hilary Clinton thus far. A CNN political commentator found himself in hotwater when he said some women deserve to be called a bitch, which by his definition seems to include aggressive, forceful women. . . in men that would be demonstrating traditional leadership skills and their ambitious.
As of 2006, women made up 50.7% of the US population, so if we’re offended by what we’re seeing, wouldn’t we “vote” to oust such negative stereotypes by choosing to consume different media? One of the main reasons we don’t see more uproar over the unbalanced coverage of women is ignorance. We’d have to recognize that the behavior is inappropriate, rather than the norm, in the first place.
Let me digress to a personal anecdote. In high school I reported being harassed by a group of male students in the hallways and in my chemistry class. Guidance had to have a few words with the guys, and the inappropriate behavior quelled, which was my goal. To my complete shock, a fellow classmate approached me in the hall to inform me that I was wrong to report the issue. “We’re women; we have to put up with it.”
Sorry, I have to disagree; what we do not denounce, we encourage and the latest studies on sexual harassment show another generation of girls growing up believing derrogatory remarks related to their gender to be the norm. Teen self-esteem expert Courtney Macavinta recently blogged about a new UC Santa Cruz study that found 9 in 10 girls between the ages of 12-18 report at least once experience of harassment at school including
**receiving inappropriate and unwanted romantic attention, hearing demeaning gender-related comments
**being teased about appearance
**receiving unwanted physical contact
**being teased, bullied, or threatened with harm by a male
The study points out that
Moreover, girls who had learned about feminism through the media or from people in their lives, including mothers and teachers, were more likely to recognize it than girls who had never heard about feminism, and girls who felt pressure from parents to conform to gender stereotypes perceived more sexism than other girls
You have to be able to identify a problem to call it out and demand change. Much like we’ve been desensitized to violence through TV, film, and video games; the same can be said of sexism and misogyny. Children are still in a culture that supports misogyny; at some point we have to break the cycle and stand up for equality, not just in women’s represenation in media, but for women in society in general.
Media that objectifies women and uses derogatory gender specific terminology reinforces language and ideology that denies women equal status. Judgement-neutral terminology should be the only acceptable language choice in so-called objective journalism, which is clearly, based on the above video, not the standard.
And it wouldn’t hurt if entertainment celebrated and multiplied strong female protagonists, instead of wondering why we need them.
Today, a voter had the audacity to ask a question the media doesn’t have the gumption to. Though poorly worded, the baptist minister directly asked McCain if he, in fact, publicly called his wife a “c*nt.” A recent biography, The Real McCain, cites that name calling as McCain’s response to his wife teasing him about his thinning hair.
As you hear, McCain dodged the question.
McCain: Now, now. You don’t want to… Um, you know that’s the great thing about town hall meetings, sir, but we really don’t, there’s people here who don’t respect that kind of language. So I’ll move on to the next questioner in the back.
Yeah, Senator McCain, “there’s people … who don’t respect that kind of language,” and they wouldn’t refer to their wife or any woman by that term. But by not responding to the question and flat out denying that you would ever call your wife such a pejorative, you’ve essentially confirmed the report of this past incident. In a society that alleges equality, we do not need the leader of the free world to be someone who refuses to address his own accusations of misogyny.
Further more, if the bat phone rings at 3am, I want a calm and collected President answering the phone, not someone who will bomb first and ask questions later because he’s upset his 6 hours of sleep were interrupted.






Recent Comments