Tag Archive for 'philosophy'

Famous failures

Since life seems to be turning around for me, I’m hoping I’ve put my days of epic failing behind me.

I ran across this video tonight that puts failure in a different perspective. The lesson: if you’ve never failed, you’ve never lived. And they’ve got the bio briefs of lots of household names to prove it.

Seems like some of our country’s greatest assets got the failing out of the way first, to pave the way to greater things. Here’s hoping!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

What philosophy do you follow?

What philosophy do you follow? (v1.03)

Your life is guided by the concept of Existentialism: You choose the meaning and purpose of your life.

“Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does.”
“It is up to you to give [life] a meaning.”
–Jean-Paul Sartre

“It is man’s natural sickness to believe that he possesses the Truth.”
–Blaise Pascal

Existentialism
95%
Hedonism
55%
Utilitarianism
55%
Kantianism
35%
Justice (Fairness)
35%
Nihilism
35%
Strong Egoism
30%
Apathy
10%
Divine Command
0%

found at Shakesville

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Conversation Cafe 2008

Over the weekend, a friend of mine told me I should apply to some PhD programs.  I’ve been losing sleep over some very fundamental philosophical questions lately:

  • If life is a social construct; how do we define the origins of the seeds of thought.  If every idea we have is shaped by what’s come  before; how can even at the start of ration thought pinpoint an original idea.  The origins of influence leads to  a sort of chicken and egg debate that will ultimately remain unresolved.
  • Power is an oxymoron.  Power is delegated to individuals by the masses who can choose to strip it at any time.  (Hilary Clinton is experiencing that loss of big name power as voters are choosing Obama again and again in primary after primary.)  Those who proclaim to be powerful can lose it at any moment based on the will of the people, so ultimately they have no power at all because that power relies on the support of an interdependent network.

While I love discussing these sorts of issues, I think writing papers on them  is a pain in the ass. So I have no inclination to go back to school again just yet.   What I did point out is that I’d love to find a salon of sorts.  A place I could go and talk about major philosophical and everyday issues with other intellectual types, all in the name of stimulating debate.  But where does one go for that sort of experience in Los Angeles.

This evening I stumbled across Conversation Cafe, which is a “a non-profit and charitable organization that seeks to foster a cooperative human community in a diverse, yet interconnected world by creating and disseminating practical tools and innovative approaches to personal and cultural change.”  The 2008 Conversation Week takes place March 24-30th encouraging people to engage in a local or online dialogue about import issues facing humanity.    Sounds up my alley.

Until February 27th, you can vote on which of the 50 finalist questions should make the final cut of 10 Questions to focus on in 2008.  You can take a look at last year’s questions  to see what to expect in March.  One of the ones I found most interesting:

How much is enough? For you? For others?
What is enough anyway? Is it having what you need? Want? What others have? Everything? When have you felt full satisfied and relaxed with no need for more? What else do you need – materially or spiritually – to feel happy? What are those basics we should all have enough of? Whose responsibility is it to make sure we all have our basic needs met? What makes people who have plenty dissatisfied with their lot in life? What do we owe the poor? What happens to people’s souls, families, communities and the world when wealth is distributed unfairly? How can we have a world where there is enough for everyone, and everyone has enough?

conversation-week.jpg

Do unto others

I am a forwarder. Whenever something winds up in my inbox that could help someone else, I pass it along. Sometimes I have to stop myself from sending helpful emails to people I don’t like — yeah, it’s info that person can use, but if we don’t get along, why am I spending time forwarding anything to that person?

Recently, I discussed my compulsive need to be useful with an advisor. There are plenty of people that are always ready to take free help, but are rarely able willing to return the gesture. In theory, when doing the right thing, one shouldn’t be focused on the return on one’s actions, rather we should just do the right thing for the sake of doing the right thing. To me, it seems as though passing useful information along to my social circle is doing the right thing. . . but I feel like I put way more energy out than comes back to me.

My advisor pointed out that the whole notion of “doing the right thing” is very a very Christian ideal. . . however, she noted, you are (I am) not Christian. Plenty of evil people are very successful, and they don’t help anyone. . . rather, they’re focused on their own needs and wants to the detriment of those around them. The universe isn’t punishing them for being self-absorbed, and we can safely conclude they’re not spending too much time wringing their hands for not doing enough.

Instead, what I need to do is focus on me and the two-way streets out there. People that are returning the energy.

I bring this issue up because I got an e-mail this evening from someone who I feel more and more is a narrow one-way lane. I actually feel kind of taken advantage of. So I’m quitting the assist cold turkey and will instead focus on sharing and helping those I feel I get an equal amount of energy back from. What goes around should come around.