Tag Archive for 'relationships'

Make every conversation engaging

Rome visit, June 2008 - 79photo © 2008 Ed Yourdon | more info (via: Wylio)Celebrity interviewer Warren Etheredge spoke at the 140 Characters Conference this week, sharing his top tips for having an engaging conversation, be it with a celebrity or a lover.

1) Prepare yourself to listen.

Smart phones, tablets, laptops, e-readers — there are endless distractions that split out attention. Some call it multi-tasking; in conversation, it’s just disrespectful. Be ready to put your full attention on the person across from you.

2) Prepare to be unprepared.

Do whatever background research you need to do to be prepared to interview. Etheredge pointed out the wide continuum of preparedness from Larry King who just winged it to James Lipton who prepares stacks of blue cards.  When it came down to questions, what they ask is actually quite similar.

But only ask questions for which you don’t know the answers; it keeps you invested in the conversation and interested in the responses.

3) Get the other party’s attention with first question.

Ask something surprising that the subject doesn’t expect. In fact, this first question is the only one Etheredge prepares to set up the the entire interview.  It might just get her to put her guard down.

4) Win her trust.

Make sure you show her that you’re there to listen and are interested in what she has to say. “Conversation is the greatest gift someone can give you.”

Body language tells is telling, so lean in and make eye contact.

5) Earn her respect.

Don’t just be a passive listener. “Let them see their story in a new light” by sharing your own experiences or thoughts on the subject. Be an active participant in the conversation.

Final thought: People touch the way the want to be touched.

If you really listen, you’ll get cues from her about how to be a better partner in conversation or in life.

Monogamy and seeing other people

176/365 - Always Kiss Me Goodnightphoto © 2010 Courtney Carmody | more info (via: Wylio)In a soon to be published study of young adults (18-25 years old), researchers found that huge misunderstandings about monogamy occur in 40 percent of couples, leading to plenty of partners who think they’ve chosen fidelity, while the other partner is unaware of such an agreement.

Disturbingly, mutually-understood monogamy is less likely in couples with children than those without. Since the type of birth control used tends to shift over the course of a relationship, many women are at increased risk of contracting a sexually transmitted infection if condom use is discontinued.

Silly of me to assume that if you’re planning to be tied to a child with someone for a lifetime, you’ve ended outside entanglements for the duration of your romantic relationship with your co-parent.

Update: A Daily Dish reader debunked the study, pointing out that the subjects were all selected because they self-identified as being part of a high risk or potentially non-monogamous relationship.

Social technology: relationship hype or helper?

Settimana Internet @ Roma - 25 giugno, Internet e Anzianiphoto © 2009 Codice Internet | more info (via: Wylio)
Over at Brass Tack Thinking, Amber Naslund took to her blog to stress that virtual relationships are as valuable and meaningful as real world ones.

Human relationships have many facets. When they’re real, they’re not real because of the things we use to cultivate them. They’re real because the human bond is there, the connection that extends beyond the means. No tool, website, or thingamajig can take that away, and none can replace it entirely. When it happens, that bond between people – either personal or professional – is as real and genuine as the individuals themselves.

I’d echo the sentiments.

I’ve lived in a lot of places over the last 15 years, and as I, and my friends, have relocated we’ve taken to the technology of the times to keep our friendships alive. From instant messaging to free weekend minutes to Friendster to LinkedIn to Facebook to Twitter, social technologies have allowed me to stay in touch with people I’ve met in real time and in greater detail than the occasional email would permit.

Had there not been meaningful connections shaped by working, schooling, and playing together, there would be no reason to stay in touch.  Genuine interest in the lives and well-being of  friends exists whether I live 5 minutes on foot or 5 hours by plane away.  I probably interact with more people on a daily basis now than I did just a few years ago because social technology makes it so effortless.

On the flipside, through blogging and twitter, I’ve met a variety of people from around the country and abroad that have enriched my life. Given the scattered geography of my digitally-discovered connections, I likely would never have met them without technology. I know them as well as my real world connections, because of the endless banter that Twitter and Facebook allow.  And I’ll never ceased to be amazed when someone approaches me at a networking event to see if I’m THAT Andrea_Zak.

In fact, I’d argue that virtual relationships have made me a better friend in real time. As someone who has always been a bit guarded with new people, technology created a buffer zone that allowed me to get to know amazing folks.  Given my online connections tend to operate outside my real world social network, open interactions somehow felt safer — even though I realize the converse is probably true.

That distance allowed me to express myself freely in ways I was, at the time, too insecure to express to live people in my presence.  Having that space helped me build up the confidence to hold my values near and dear 24/7, not just when I’m chatting away with a semi-stranger that comments on my blog. Now I’m more likely to make genuine connections with people, because I’m more comfortable sharing of myself and build stronger bonds as a result.

Can the internet be an interminable waste land? You betcha.  But it can also be an electronic coffee clutch that keeps you in the know about the people that matter to you.

Social technology: relationship hype or helper?

March Sex and Relationship News Round Up

orange flowers

photo by bensonkua

Bad relationships don’t just take a toll on your mental health, they do damage to your heart and metabolic processes as well.

While both men and women in “strained” unions, those marked by arguing and being angry, were more likely to feel depressed than happier partners, the women in the contentious relationships were more likely to develop high blood pressure, high cholesterol, high blood sugar and other markers of what’s known as “metabolic syndrome,” said study author Nancy Henry, a doctoral candidate in clinical healthy psychology at the University of Utah.

Metabolic syndrome is known to boost the risk of heart disease, stroke and diabetes.

If your relationship isn’t headed in a direction you’re happy with, you have yet another reason to ask, is it worth it?

Alternately, a new study draws into question previous conclusions about marriage and relationships.  Previously, biological anthropologists like Helen Fisher concluded that early in a relationship heightened hormones drove passion and lust, which leveled off after 2-4 years to a more level attachment that kept many relationships together.

In a just published study in the Review of General Psychology, researchers looked at couples from college and middle-age brackets who experienced romantic, passionate, or friendship based love in short and long-term relationships.  Couples who kept the romance going had the most satisfaction in both types of relationships.  Couples in more obsessive relationships were happier in the short-term, than long.  Since it’s just a handful of couples, much more research needs to be done, which could shift our understanding of human partnerships.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

VOD: Malaise de L'Orange

Here’s a Multimedia class assignment by weem. Her assignment: tell a story in pictures.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

February Sex & Relationship News Round Up

As you should know by now, one of my random interests in research into human sexuality and relationships.  It’s fascinating.  So I periodically bring you news of the latest, often preliminary findings, announced by researchers…

1. Can’t help but seriously date more than one guy at a time?  Consistently  bored with your main squeeze? Blame it on sex hormone oestradiol.

The researchers found that a woman’s oestradiol level was positively associated with self-perceived physical attractiveness. Women with a higher oestradiol level also reported a greater likelihood of flirting, kissing and having a serious affair (but not a one-night stand) with a new partner.

Oestradiol levels were negatively associated with a woman’s satisfaction with her primary partner.

2. A microbicidal gel for women in an international trial possibly protected 30% of users from contracting HIV by blocking the virus from attaching to white blood cells.  Further testing is necessary to confirm.

Researchers hope gels and other microbicide creams could help protect women whose partners refuse to wear condoms.

I want to know why women are willing to date men who don’t care enough for their partners’ health to wear a condom.

3. Despite young African-American women being one of the fastest growing demographics contracting sexually transmitted diseases, only 1 in 4 African-American teens are receiving the HPV vaccine, which severely limits likelihood of cervical cancer.  Roughly 1 in 4 American women between 14-59 years of age are infected with HPV.

4. Kissing lowers cortisol levels in men and women, making it a great stress reliever. But unexplainably, kissing also increases the oxytocin (AKA the love hormone) level in men, while simultaneous decreasing it in women.  Researchers plan to investigate if the kissing venue plays a role in the oxytocin changes in women.

And just for fun: balloon animal sex.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

VOD: Helen Fisher on Love

One of my favorite reads of 2008 was the long ago book Anatomy of Love: A Natural History of Mating, Marriage, and Why We Stray by Helen Fisher.

In 2006 she gave a talk at the annual elitist TED conference about the biochemical and behavioral markers of romantic love, as well as gender differences.  If you’re not likely to read the book, take 20 minutes of your day to watch the video.

Do the same rules apply to you?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

VOD: Imaginary Bitches — The Series

I’m actually not sure how I stumbled across the webisode series Imaginary Bitches, but I’m glad that I did.

It’s a humorous take on the the modern day struggle to be a single lady when all your friends are in relationships.  Lead singleton Eden creates two imaginary friends that fill the void left by her unavailable best friends.   Hijinks and laughter ensue.

Here’s the Season 1 playlist.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Social networking makes professional women more competitive

network

graphic by jared

I’ve been thinking about the background research on that McKinsey study of Model Centered Leadership.  Particularly the brief mention about how

men tend to build broader, shallower networks than women do and that the networks of men give them a wider range of resources for gaining knowledge and professional opportunities.

Given the very long arm of social networks, it seems as though the internet is helping to level the networking playing field for professional women.  Women are definitely engaging online; for instance, 55% of FaceBook users are female.

How do the two relate?  I read status updates on a regular basis indicating my friends and acquaintances are connecting with elementary school friends, long last college hall mates, former professors, etc.

Ten years ago, you had no way of keeping track of hundreds of tangential connections that you hold face or name recognition with, but little more.  Now you can connect online with just about every person you meet in real time. . . not that you’d want to.

When you’re looking for a new job or a new house or a new boyfriend, your circle of connections has grown that much larger when you connect with people you liked from past chapters of your life, people you’d otherwise have lost touched with, if not for social networking.

Isn’t social networking allowing us all to build broad, shallow networks of acquaintances we can reach out to as needed?  This natural evolution of the internet seems to be giving women the tools to be as competitive as men when it comes to networking.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

News round up for singletons

There have been a lot of thought-provoking news bites lately that are relevant to young adults living single.  I’ve compiled a few for your consideration.

Singles Statistics

Which cities are home to the most singles, which might make those cities more likely spots to find a partner?

Rank Metro % Single
1 San Francisco, CA 44.7
2 Detroit, MI 44
3 New York, NY 39.8
4 Boston, MA 39.2
5 New Orleans, LA 39.1
6 Los Angeles, CA 37.7
7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 37.2
8 Las Vegas, NV 37
9 Miami, FL 36.9
10 Albuquerque, NM 36.8

But singleton stats alone don’t make for great dating opportunities.  Consider the ratio of males:females, as well as age breaks. (H/T Sullivan).  Women tend to be outnumbered by men in urban areas. . . which means we get to be pickier, since there are fewer women on the dating market.

Ezra Klein points explains the discrepancy and points out a flaw in the data that should shift the blue globes a bit.

The reason for this, basically, is that women marry younger. About 1/3rd of women are married by age 24. Only 1/5th of men are. That creates some imbalance. . . Single, in this definition, is counted as never married, divorced, or widowed, so you’re missing a lot of folks, particularly in the upper ranges, who are on the dating market but not caught in this data.

Since census data was used to crunch data for each of the above breaks, it bears reminding that the census doesn’t factor in homosexuality.  Cities with strong gay communities, like San Francisco, may skew the ratio of available men to women.  This caveat applies for the chart and graphic above.

The Warm and Fuzzies

Looking to make a connection with your date?  Make sure (s)he enjoys a warm beverage with your meal.  Science published the latest in interpersonal relationship influences this week.

In the first study, Williams and John A. Bargh, a psychology professor at Yale University, found that holding a hot cup of coffee leads people to judge a stranger to be a warmer person, in terms of such traits as generosity and kindness, compared with a group of people who held a cup of iced coffee.

Also of note, a study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that a woman wearing red inclines men to spend more on a date.

Men said they would spend more money on a woman pictured in red, compared with the same woman wearing a blue shirt. . . On average, wearing red meant a more expensive night out, and in general, a higher rating of attractiveness.

Women appear to be immune to the same color skews.  I’m going to leave the matador/bull analogies to the readers.  As for me, I’m happy to report I wear red well.

Mood-Altering Benefits of Semen

Should a woman make it to the monogamous relationship stage, relying on birth control other than condoms, regular vaginal exposure to semen may have an anti-depressant effect.  The research soon to be published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior concludes:

Semen makes you happy. That’s the remarkable conclusion of a study comparing women whose partners wear condoms with those whose partners don’t.

The study, which is bound to provoke controversy, showed that the women who were directly exposed to semen were less depressed. The researchers think this is because mood-altering hormones in semen are absorbed through the vagina. They say they have ruled out other explanations.

On that note, my round up of (potential) relationship influencers ends.  Will geography matter more with that next job offer?  Will you reconsider what you wear on your next date?  Does “just coffee” now seem more appealing?

Til next time.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button